As we close the decade since the 2008-09 global financial crisis, the emphasis on culture and conduct in banking has never been higher. Financial and reputational consequences of misconduct and cultural failures have placed increased responsibility on boards and senior management to demonstrate effective measurement, management and oversight of conduct and culture. Although many organizations today have commenced some form of culture and conduct reporting, most are narrowly focused on misconduct, and continue to struggle with using multiple lenses to develop a holistic view of the culture at their organizations.
Our new paper is part two in our Conduct and Culture series. In the previous installment, we presented a Value-Metrics mapping methodology for organizations to identify meaningful metrics based on their alignment to the fundamental principles of the company. Part two, Measuring Conduct and Culture, helps organizations derive meaning and realize the insights. Through our experience with advising clients and research, we present the necessary metrics to focus on, how to monitor them and how to look for meaning in the data to generate true insights.
Although many organizations today have commenced some form of culture and conduct reporting, most are narrowly focused on misconduct, and continue to struggle with using multiple lenses to develop a holistic view of the culture at their organizations. Culture must be steered by design, otherwise it naturally evolves to suit the surrounding context